Skip to main content

unbound-method

Enforce unbound methods are called with their expected scope.

💭

This rule requires type information to run.

Class method functions don't preserve the class scope when passed as standalone variables ("unbound"). If your function does not access this, you can annotate it with this: void, or consider using an arrow function instead. Otherwise, passing class methods around as values can remove type safety by failing to capture this.

This rule reports when a class method is referenced in an unbound manner.

Tip

If you're working with jest, you can use eslint-plugin-jest's version of this rule to lint your test files, which knows when it's ok to pass an unbound method to expect calls.

.eslintrc.cjs
module.exports = {
"rules": {
"@typescript-eslint/unbound-method": "error"
}
};

Try this rule in the playground ↗

Examples

class MyClass {
public log(): void {
console.log(this);
}
}

const instance = new MyClass();

// This logs the global scope (`window`/`global`), not the class instance
const myLog = instance.log;
myLog();

// This log might later be called with an incorrect scope
const { log } = instance;

// arith.double may refer to `this` internally
const arith = {
double(x: number): number {
return x * 2;
},
};
const { double } = arith;
Open in Playground

Options

This rule accepts the following options:

type Options = [
{
/** Whether to skip checking whether `static` methods are correctly bound. */
ignoreStatic?: boolean;
},
];

const defaultOptions: Options = [{ ignoreStatic: false }];

ignoreStatic

Examples of correct code for this rule with { ignoreStatic: true }:

class OtherClass {
static log() {
console.log(OtherClass);
}
}

// With `ignoreStatic`, statics are assumed to not rely on a particular scope
const { log } = OtherClass;

log();
Open in Playground

When Not To Use It

If your project dynamically changes this scopes around in a way TypeScript has difficulties modeling, this rule may not be viable to use. For example, some functions have an additional parameter for specifying the this context, such as Reflect.apply, and array methods like Array.prototype.map. This semantic is not easily expressed by TypeScript. You might consider using ESLint disable comments for those specific situations instead of completely disabling this rule.

If you're wanting to use toBeCalled and similar matches in jest tests, you can disable this rule for your test files in favor of eslint-plugin-jest's version of this rule.


Type checked lint rules are more powerful than traditional lint rules, but also require configuring type checked linting.

See Troubleshooting > Linting with Type Information > Performance if you experience performance degredations after enabling type checked rules.

Resources